To provide you with the best experience on this website, cookies are used. By using the site it's assumed that you're happy with our use of cookies. However, you can change your cookie settings at any time. More info on cookies.
Allow cookies

What does the Chancellor’s Budget mean for the estates industry?

29th March 2017

Categories: Latest News

As a property professional the Chancellor's budget is always of interest to me.  Whether there are changes in Stamp Duty Land Tax thresholds, business rates amendments or announcements to facilitate the housing industry, I always listen out for changes that may affect me personally or my profession generally.  I am pleased to say the budget on the 8th March didn’t let me down.  This budget presented an opportunity for the government to counter the thoughts of many of my peers that the real estate industry is low down the priority list.  Unfortunately, in my opinion it failed to change that view point.  Certainly if I thought any real changes to business rates were going to be announced I was left disappointed.    Although the mass of protests to the rates revaluation at the start of April did not completely fall on deaf ears.  Chancellor Hammond did offer some £435m of cuts to business rates centred around 3 areas.  A £300m fund for discretionary rates relief, discounts applied to public houses with a rateable value of less than £100,000 and a cap of £50 a month for businesses coming out of business rates relief. It goes without saying these measures are certainly welcome but clearly there is no real help for businesses facing large increases in business rates.

So what measures did the Chancellor decide not to pursue further, particularly on the issue of business rates?  Talking to my peers in a recent property conference it was agreed there were several key omissions.  These included, crucially, no tapering of increases in business rates and also a failure to remove the cap which prevents businesses from benefiting from any decrease in business rates.

A point of particular debate was the Government's rejection to remove certain specific wording which would be used when assessing appeals.  As drafted it would now appear that businesses will be forced to pay any assessment deemed to be "reasonable" by the Valuation Tribunal, even if the rateable value could be proved to be lower on appeal.  The Chancellor did promise to introduce a 'smoother' business rates system and hinted at the likelihood of more frequent revaluations and the possibility of a form of self assessment.  On the face of it, these changes would help deliver a more responsive business rates system and reduction of the high level of appeals currently under consideration. Of course, the devil is in the detail and we shall wait and see how this is rolled out in due course.

Well, I shall look forward to the next budget in the Autumn, assuming of course there is no dramatic u-turn on business rates in the interim on a similar scale to the change announced on national insurance contributions!

Paul Palmer is TDA's Estates Manager and can be contacted at

RSS feeds


March 2020

February 2020

January 2020

December 2019

November 2019

October 2019

September 2019

August 2019

July 2019

June 2019

May 2019

April 2019

March 2019

February 2019

January 2019

December 2018

October 2018

September 2018

August 2018

July 2018

May 2018

April 2018

March 2018

February 2018

January 2018

December 2017

November 2017

October 2017

September 2017

August 2017

July 2017

June 2017

May 2017

April 2017

March 2017

February 2017

January 2017